Thanks Spencer for your review. Actually the scope has always been TLS1.2 only. I confirm version 05 have addressed Erik's comments. Yours, Daniel
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Kathleen Moriarty < kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Spencer Dawkins > <spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria. > html > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Ciphersuite drafts for TLS are usually above my pay grade, but I > > understand most of EKR's Discuss, and agree with Adam's suggestion to > > change the document title to "ECDHE_PSK with AES-GCM and AES-CCM Cipher > > Suites for Transport Layer Security Version 1.2 (TLS 1.2)" at an absolute > > minimum. > > The shepherd proposed a resolution that should clear up the discuss points. > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Kathleen >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
