On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Ciphersuite drafts for TLS are usually above my pay grade, but I > understand most of EKR's Discuss, and agree with Adam's suggestion to > change the document title to "ECDHE_PSK with AES-GCM and AES-CCM Cipher > Suites for Transport Layer Security Version 1.2 (TLS 1.2)" at an absolute > minimum.
The shepherd proposed a resolution that should clear up the discuss points. > > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
