Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> writes: >I was with you up to this point, but I do think that going back to SSL is not >a good idea, and takes us off topic.
It was just something to throw out there, and to point out that no matter what the WG calls it, the rest of the world will keep calling it SSL. It's been twenty years, it's not going to change any more now. >Opening it up even wider seems like a sure way to get nowhere (which is >likely status quo TLS 1.3). Yeah, fair enough. It would be nice to finally fix a 20-year-old mistake though. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
