Hello, On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
> With this in mind, I'm voting in favor of any re-branding of TLS 1.3 where the > protocol name remains "TLS" and major version becomes > 1. I originally hummed for 1.3 in the room as that is what people (that are currently aware of it) know it by. However, as the new standard goes out into the world, a major revision number seems appropriate to recognize the significant changes that have gone into it. +1 Darin Pettis U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations --------------------------------------------------------------------- Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
