Hi, +1 --- keep TLS 1.3
Cheers, - Ira On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Hubert Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Friday, 18 November 2016 11:12:48 CET Sean Turner wrote: > > At IETF 97, the chairs lead a discussion to resolve whether the WG should > > rebrand TLS1.3 to something else. Slides can be found @ > > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides- > 97-tls-rebranding-aka-pr6 > > 12-01.pdf. > > > > The consensus in the room was to leave it as is, i.e., TLS1.3, and to not > > rebrand it to TLS 2.0, TLS 2, or TLS 4. We need to confirm this decision > > on the list so please let the list know your top choice between: > > > > - Leave it TLS 1.3 > > - Rebrand TLS 2.0 > > - Rebrand TLS 2 > > - Rebrand TLS 4 > > Keep it at TLS 1.3. > > TLS 2.0 and 2 are just too likely to be confused with SSL 2. > > -- > Regards, > Hubert Kario > Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team > Web: www.cz.redhat.com > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
