> Well, for example, your website has twice as many mentions of SSL as TLS. > Why? Why don't you have a product called "Universal TLS"? The ratio is the > same for letsencrypto.org. TLS 1.0 had already existed for more then a decade > before either place existed. BTW, at google, it's 20:1, and that's just > google, not the web. (Counts were done in the obvious dumb way > "site:letsencrypt.org tls" and then with "ssl" and noting the summary stats > at the top of the return results.) > > People are confused because we treat them as the same thing.
Well, if the result of the confusion would be people *disabling* TLS 1.* in favor of SSL 3.0, they would discover very quickly what is TLS, and why no major browser works for them. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
