On 18 November 2016 at 11:12, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > - Leave it TLS 1.3
There is no point in re-litigating this decision. The consensus call was pretty clear in the room. Perhaps the question would have been better phrased as: "does anyone have new information that would suggest those present at the meeting made the wrong choice?" or "does anyone vehemently object to this decision?" I see no new information in the responses thus far. On 18 November 2016 at 16:27, Dave Garrett <davemgarr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I suspect that a push for a major version bump a year and a half ago would've > had more support Yep, that would have been a more appropriate time to raise the naming thing. Now lots of people know this thing as TLS 1.3, which means a name change would be a big setback to our marketing efforts (such as they are ;)... _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
