I also prefer TLS 4 but am fine with TLS 1.3 - Erik
On Nov 17, 2016 9:41 PM, "Yoav Nir" <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bleh. Can’t we get AOL to release the SSL trademark so that we can call it > SSLv4? > > I hummed for TLS 4, so I’ll stay consistent: TLS 4. > > Yoav > > > On 18 Nov 2016, at 11:12, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > > > At IETF 97, the chairs lead a discussion to resolve whether the WG > should rebrand TLS1.3 to something else. Slides can be found @ > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides- > 97-tls-rebranding-aka-pr612-01.pdf. > > > > The consensus in the room was to leave it as is, i.e., TLS1.3, and to > not rebrand it to TLS 2.0, TLS 2, or TLS 4. We need to confirm this > decision on the list so please let the list know your top choice between: > > > > - Leave it TLS 1.3 > > - Rebrand TLS 2.0 > > - Rebrand TLS 2 > > - Rebrand TLS 4 > > > > by 2 December 2016. > > > > Thanks, > > J&S > > _______________________________________________ > > TLS mailing list > > TLS@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
