On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 October 2016 at 06:58, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > I'm ambivalent on this. OTOH, you're technically right, but OTOH it's > just > > one more conditional to save a few bytes (you need padding to exist > anyway), > > and if you're doing 0-RTT, you're about to send a lot more bytes anyway. > > 0-RTT happens when you have a small CWND. Fair enough. > I thought that it was maybe > worth it. The space I'm seeing padded is enough for an extra request, > maybe two. > Note: this will change somewhat with draft-18, because ClientHello is going to expand by ~32 octets. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
