On 31 October 2016 at 06:58, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > I'm ambivalent on this. OTOH, you're technically right, but OTOH it's just > one more conditional to save a few bytes (you need padding to exist anyway), > and if you're doing 0-RTT, you're about to send a lot more bytes anyway.
0-RTT happens when you have a small CWND. I thought that it was maybe worth it. The space I'm seeing padded is enough for an extra request, maybe two. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
