On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Ackermann, Michael
<mackerm...@bcbsm.com> wrote:
> From the perspective an Enterprise that runs these applications and has 
> invested HEAVILY in the debugging networks.........
>
> The reason we are debugging these networks is so that "The 5-6 order of 
> magnitude of folks using them"  will have good service.   If they do not,  
> they will consider competitors and/or generate a litany service calls or 
> complaints.        I.E.     When these "Folks"  are slow or not working they 
> are just as unhappy as we are.
>

Isn't that the market operating as expected? Those who deliver a
stable product at a competitive price are rewarded, while those who
fail to deliver or deliver at an unreasonable cost are not? (Some hand
waiving).

If all providers failed to deliver or delivered an inferior product,
then it might indicate a major course correction is needed. But I
don't think that's the case here.

Jeff

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to