On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted to remind everybody that we’ve got two non-TLS1.3 items we’re > looking for WG input on: > > - Before 12 July, we’d like to know your thoughts about progressing > draft-ietf-tls-pwd (Watson and ekr responded): > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/WrNa7PXTZn2ZhfmoQDA_pnUVuN4 > > - Before 14 July, we’d like to know your thoughts on the proposed AUTH48 > proposed changes (nobody has commented on this): > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aBvqMG7t8qkO5rPt-xaMHipuBVk
I don't like the AUTH48 changes. I understand the need for changing to MAY, but the proposed method of distinguishing offends my sensibilities. Overloading the length field is just ugly. > > spt > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls -- "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains". --Rousseau. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
