I've modified the branch to use your wording. As Viktor said, it doesn't address his objection, but it's still a more precise starting point for further discussion.
Kyle On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thom...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19 May 2016 at 16:01, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote: >> Nevertheless, some clients may want to attempt to gain fine-grained >> protection against correlating back to back or parallel resumption >> requests. For this they'd have to ensure that all session tickets >> are single use, and either perform new handshakes when increasing >> the number of parallel connections to the server, or somehow obtain >> more than one ticket within a single session. > > I believe that this is the intent of the PR. I've suggested an > alternative wording that cleaves closer to your text above. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
