On 19 May 2016 at 16:01, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-d...@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> Nevertheless, some clients may want to attempt to gain fine-grained
> protection against correlating back to back or parallel resumption
> requests.  For this they'd have to ensure that all session tickets
> are single use, and either perform new handshakes when increasing
> the number of parallel connections to the server, or somehow obtain
> more than one ticket within a single session.

I believe that this is the intent of the PR.  I've suggested an
alternative wording that cleaves closer to your text above.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to