Any objections to early allocation for X25519 and X448? Are there implementers with code ready to test interop?
Thanks, Joe On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Brian Smith <br...@briansmith.org> wrote: > Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > >> Allocating a code point for X25519 could be done and is long overdue >> (first draft September 2013). X448 is also stable. Code points for >> Ed25519 and Ed448 is more problematic since TLS authentication has >> historically had interaction with PKIX certs. I agree with Yoav's >> assertion that the curve point verification issue is not big enough to >> stall code point allocation. > > > I agree with this. > > Cheers, > Brian >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
