Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > Allocating a code point for X25519 could be done and is long overdue > (first draft September 2013). X448 is also stable. Code points for > Ed25519 and Ed448 is more problematic since TLS authentication has > historically had interaction with PKIX certs. I agree with Yoav's > assertion that the curve point verification issue is not big enough to > stall code point allocation.
I agree with this. Cheers, Brian
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
