Bryan Ford <brynosau...@gmail.com> wrote : > 2. The 2-byte length field in each record's header no longer > indicates the length of the *current* record but instead indicates > the length of the *next* record. The length of the first record > might be defined in a new field we add to the handshake/key-exchange > protocol, or it might simply be set to some well-known standard first > record size.
Using a standard size for the first message sounds like an amazingly good idea, irrespective of whether the idea of each message containing the next message's size works out. Any thoughts on how big this first message should be? Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
