Dear Bryan, On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Bryan A Ford <brynosau...@gmail.com> wrote:
DTLS: > > Now there's still the important question of whether this (new) proposal > could be made to work in the context of DTLS. For the DTLS case, my > current thinking is that some elements of my earlier proposal is > probably more suitable: namely using a stream cipher (or AEAD used as a > stream cipher) to encrypt and recognize the explicitly-transmitted > sequence numbers that DTLS needs. This could operate basically the same > as I described in my earlier E-mail on this topic. Note that the length > field is no longer a problem in DTLS as it is in TLS, because the > receiver already gets the length of the datagram from UDP. > > Do I understand correctly that your propose makes difficult to derive the key from the original value depending on the sequence number? -- SY, Dmitry Belyavsky
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
