I am planning to use "forward secrecy" On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:17 AM, William Whyte <wwh...@securityinnovation.com > wrote:
> If we want to change to “key erasure” we should synch with CFRG and SAAG > to ensure it’s used IETF-wide. I don’t think that “forward secrecy” is so > broken that it needs fixing. > > > > Cheers, > > > > William > > > > *From:* TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Arcieri > *Sent:* Monday, November 30, 2015 11:20 PM > *To:* Hugo Krawczyk > *Cc:* tls@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [TLS] bikeshed: Forward Security or Secrecy? > > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Hugo Krawczyk <h...@ee.technion.ac.il> > wrote: > > The more common term is "forward secrecy" > > > > I'd second this. I'm also a fan of Dan Bernstein's recommended term: "key > erasure" > > > > -- > > Tony Arcieri > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
