On Nov 14, 2015 2:18 PM, "Eric Rescorla" <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > I'm fine either way. As Adam says, it wouldn't be harmful to wait for > the signature code point assignments for a bit, but I doubt it would > be that harmful not to. People who deploy the signature schemes > before they are stable do so at their own risk. Also, that risk seems > low since you're not going to have public certificates with these > schemes until they are stable.
+1 -DC-
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
