+1 The IANA considerations section in the github copy has the same identifiers. https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis.xml <https://github.com/tlswg/rfc4492bis/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis.xml>
Yoav > On 14 Nov 2015, at 8:36 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > I support this code point assignment and we should also pull the same code > points into RFC 4492-bis. > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Adam Langley <a...@imperialviolet.org > <mailto:a...@imperialviolet.org>> wrote: > The IESG conflicts review for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-curves/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-curves/> has now > completed without issue[1]. > > The editor's copy of the 1.3 spec contains code points for these > curves[2], specifically: > > // ECDH functions. > ecdh_x25519 (29), ecdh_x448 (30), > > // Signature curves. > eddsa_ed25519 (31), eddsa_ed448 (32), > > I'd like to request that these code points for early assignment. > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/MWmqSxBZxWPEt6glXJZvXg5lMS4 > > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/MWmqSxBZxWPEt6glXJZvXg5lMS4> > [2] https://tlswg.github.io/tls13-spec/#rfc.section.6.3.2.2 > <https://tlswg.github.io/tls13-spec/#rfc.section.6.3.2.2> > > > Cheers > > AGL > > -- > Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org <mailto:a...@imperialviolet.org> > https://www.imperialviolet.org <https://www.imperialviolet.org/> > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org <mailto:TLS@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls> > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
