On 4 November 2015 at 11:16, Yoav Nir <ynir.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can’t we just say that all previous uses of tis-unique will instead get an 
> exporter generated with the label “tis-unique” ?


That was my thought here: redefine what it means to generate tls-unique.

That's part of why I asked about the size.  We should ensure that
clients are not made sad if they receive a tls-unique that is longer
than 96 bits.

We could backport this to 1.2, but I'm not sure whether this is a new
feature or whether it's a bug fix.  If it is the former, I'm not that
enthusiastic about a backport.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to