Can you expand on this a bit? Perhaps propose some text. -Ekr
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melni...@isode.com> wrote: > Just to clarify, I think it is fine to define TLS 1.3 replacement for > tls-unique using Exporters. But I suggest for interoperability this should > be defined as a new channel binding with a new name, as opposed to just > redefining tls-unique. > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
