>> >> So, should it stay or should it go now? Opinions? >> > >> > +1 that sect571r1 be removed. >> >> I also believe that it should be removed. > > Same here, I think in this case "less is more". There is no > compelling reason for this curve, and needless diversity here is > counter-productive. > It provides 256-bits of security. Its the only curve I am aware that can transport a AES-256 key while maintaining security levels.
(I've been through C&A's where matching security levels were examined). _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
