> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:19 PM, Benjamin Beurdouche > <benjamin.beurdou...@inria.fr> wrote: > > Hey, > > Except if someone has a real need for it, > I would favour removing p571 and keep secp521r1 as the maximum …
+1 It should be noted that I have removed it from RFC4492bis. In terms of real-world use secp256r1>>secp384r1>>secp521r1 and everything else is lost in the noise. At any rate, if the group decides to keep it, I might as well bring it back to 4492bis as well. Yoav _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
