I occasionally refer to people who use tiddlywiki as *tiddleurs* (pronounced with a French accent, in my mind) I don't expect anyone else to use it but I stick to it because I think it is funny (...hm, I'm not normally that easily amused). If anyone has to ask what I mean, then no biggie. So, I say go with your terminology, whatever makes you happy!
<:-) On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 11:36:55 AM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > @Mat > > Never mind! > > Just image you always have to say "the employing person" vs "the employed > person". Anyway, I wanted to add some information about transclusions into > my wiki and looked for some suitable tiddler titles. > *TheTranscludingTiddler* and *TheTranscludedTiddler* seemed to > cumbersome. So I chose the suggested terms. They work for me, and I thought > they might be useful in general. > > Thanks for your remarks! > > -Reinhard > > On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 11:21:10 AM UTC+1 Reinhard Engel wrote: > >> @TiddlyTweeter >> >> You wrote: >> >> "Part of the issue* though* is that in TW "transclusion" is potentially >> *radical*. Transclusions can be nested infinitely. So, in that context, >> the terms "Transcluder" / "Transcludee" would not be so transparent in >> actual use" >> >> If transclusions are nested, each intermediate tiddler takes on both the >> roles *transcludee* and *transcluder*. >> The relationship is between the transcluder and the transcludee is >> strictly binary. The transcluder doesn't and shouldn't care about how the >> transcludee produces its content. >> >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5cf94336-ca24-4425-9b84-a044fc4cae2an%40googlegroups.com.
