LOL! Sure, but you're running the risk of having to explain the term which kind of nullifies the point... ;-)
<:-) On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 8:57:24 AM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > When talking about transclusions, it's a little cumbersome to talk about *the > tiddler that's doing the transclusion* and *the tiddler that's being > transcluded*. > > So, if it has been done before or elsewhere, may I suggest the two terms > > *Transcluder* (the tiddler that's doing the transclusion) > *Transcludee* (the tiddler that's being transcluded) > > patterned af *employer* and *employee*? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0e5f02c9-d454-4741-a9f4-10d766029ee1n%40googlegroups.com.
