I'm trying to add namespace support now, and I have a question for you, Xavier, since you seem to have more experience with them.
Are they actually this awful? Named namespaces aren't too bad. Just tie the prefix to the url, (like nm to http://namespace.com) and you can /nm:call/nm:elements/nm:all/nm:the/nm:way/nm:down. But if you use default namespaces, the standard XPath practice is to / [local-name()='make']/[local-name()='your']/[local-name()='paths']/ [local-name()='like']/[local-name()='this']. Is this for real? Is it really that bad? It looks like the best alternative I can do is make it so any undeclared prefix can act as the default namespace, but I get the sense that's not an expected practice. -Flibbles -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/41ba7ea9-0477-4409-86fe-35f7b2167a6b%40googlegroups.com.
