On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 15:21 +0200, Sebastian Krämer wrote: > On 06/03/2011 12:14 PM, Jindrich Novy wrote: > >> Does this make sense to you? What can I do about it? > > > > Yes. It is caused by the fact that Fedora evince is linked against old > > kpathsea library. The new and old kpathsea libraries can not actually > > coexist so the only solution is to remove evince-dvi. Then you can > > alternatively build evince locally against the new TeX Live. > > Hello Jindrich, > > thanks for your reply. I'm not planning on building evince locally and > TL2010 isn't that necessary for me, I was rather curious. > Do you think it's a valid request for evince to switch to another > version, something that could be filed in gnome's or redhat's bugzilla? > As I understand it, that would be necessary in the long run anyway. >
Rebuilding evince is trivial. Grab the SRPM and then just "rpmbuild --rebuild <pkgname>. I can post the RPMs someplace for you to pick up if you want. > Btw., what about filing TL2010 as FutureFeature for F16? Would that be a > feasible goal? > > Greetings, > > Sebastian > _______________________________________________ > TeXLive mailing list > TeXLive@linux.cz > http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs _______________________________________________ TeXLive mailing list TeXLive@linux.cz http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
