On 06/04/2011 05:55 PM, Matthew Saltzman wrote: > On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 15:21 +0200, Sebastian Krämer wrote: >> On 06/03/2011 12:14 PM, Jindrich Novy wrote: >>>> Does this make sense to you? What can I do about it? >>> >>> Yes. It is caused by the fact that Fedora evince is linked against old >>> kpathsea library. The new and old kpathsea libraries can not actually >>> coexist so the only solution is to remove evince-dvi. Then you can >>> alternatively build evince locally against the new TeX Live. >> >> Hello Jindrich, >> >> thanks for your reply. I'm not planning on building evince locally and >> TL2010 isn't that necessary for me, I was rather curious. >> Do you think it's a valid request for evince to switch to another >> version, something that could be filed in gnome's or redhat's bugzilla? >> As I understand it, that would be necessary in the long run anyway. >> > > Rebuilding evince is trivial. Grab the SRPM and then just "rpmbuild > --rebuild <pkgname>. I can post the RPMs someplace for you to pick up > if you want.
Hello again, thanks for the offer, Matthew. I didn't really consider rpmbuild tools, for some reason (maybe I haven't done enough manual compiling on fedora yet). I overlooked the fact that removing evince-dvi (only!) works and breaks the dependency conflict, the rest of evince stays intact. Jindrich, you mentioned it, but when I replied earlier I hadn't realized this fact. For now I'll live without dvi support and build from source if the need arises. Thanks, folks! Sebastian PS: Btw, is there a good writing about what the different texlive collections contain or which ones to install "first"? I was thinking about reducing the texlive footprint a little but it's hard to decide which packages to leave out (from all 380 packages that would get upgraded as it is right now). PPS: There was a discussion about this dependency earlier in bugzilla, bug #426388. _______________________________________________ TeXLive mailing list TeXLive@linux.cz http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
