On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:37 AM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I find it hard to draw the line somewhere between all these cases. So 
> aborting a previous operation is not ok, but not even starting a second 
> operation is ok? Installing and removing the same package is not blocking? 
> What about installing two different packages, would that block? What about 
> installing A and removing B? I don't honestly think it's a good idea to dig 
> into the million of sub-cases here.

> Just imagine we're not talking about the package manager but a file manager 
> instead. If you could either create a file, or remove a file, but you 
> couldn't create&remove the file, or you couldn't remove 2 different either 
> sequentially or together, that would clearly be a blocker (I hope). It would 
> be quite obvious that this is a basic functionality. So why isn't this a 
> basic functionality for the package manager? And why do we have (it seems) a 
> different quality bar for dnf vs graphical package managers? I don't think 
> these bugs would be waived for dnf.
>
I agree with FrantiĊĦek's comment that the DNF case is different enough
in how it functions that it's not a fair comparison. I do think that
aborting a previous operation is not okay, but refusing to start a
second operation until the first is done is. Ideally with a clear
message explaining why, but not necessarily.

So I still disagree with you, but my position is softening. I'd rather
we have a clearly-defined and understood set of criteria that I
disagree with in some places than to try to make every criterion match
my preferences. :-) So while I disagree, I'm happy to move forward
with this.

> So let's reduce the original requirement into something like this:
> * configure software sources by enabling/disabling pre-defined official 
> repositories and then adjust the available software pool accordingly
>
> Does it sound better?

Yes, that works for me.



-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to