On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 3:48 PM Brandon Nielsen <niels...@jetfuse.net> wrote:
> On 11/3/21 6:31 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > During the F35 release cycle, there was a dissatisfaction that we use the > "basic functionality" criterion [1] too broadly when discussing package > manager issues (like multiple issues in plasma-discover). I was asked in > the latest QA meeting to propose a specific criterion to cover package > managers in detail. Here it is. > > Please note that we already have package management partly covered in the > Basic criteria [2] and Beta criteria [3]. Please read those first, > including footnotes. The following new criterion is proposed against the > Final milestone: > > ~~~~~~~~~~ > The default graphical package manager for a given software type must > appropriately: > > Should this read "for a given release type"? "Software type" feels > ambiguous. > "Software type" is defined at [2], and the criteria from [2] and [3] use the same phrasing. (See my original mail for link references). I'm not opposed to changing all occurrences of this, if we have a better term :-) > * install, remove and update software, even if multiple operations are > scheduled sequentially or concurrently > * list software installed on the system > * list available software (possibly in categories, a curated list, etc) > * display metadata relevant to the selected software (e.g. the > description, screenshots, the size) > * start the selected installed software > > Should they all really function as launchers as well? I know GNOME's does, > not sure how common that is across the board. > Both GNOME Software and KDE Discover provide that functionality. I think the idea is that you hit Install, and then you hit Launch/Open, instead of searching for the new launcher in your system menu. It's good for trying out different apps, etc. If the button is there, it should work, in my opinion. > Looks really good otherwise. > Thanks.
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure