I'm not disputing the negativity concerning RPMS,
as I've had my annoyances with them, occassionally.
(Mostly when I first started working with RedHat.)
However, I would like to understand some of the
criticism they get. What is it that makes compiling
from source better than installing from an RPM?
What are the advantages of apt-get over RPM?
Overall they make my life and upgrading, etc,
significantly simpler and a lot more organized.
I had found them to be a useful way to keep track
of what I have installed, and to uninstall things that
I don't use/need anymore. Not to mention upgrading
existing files, etc...
Walt
-~
Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far.
Theodore Roosevelt
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
