In classical security thought.. once someone has physical access to a box (router,
workstation, etc) they are assumed to "own" the box.. and in most cases this is quite
true.. so physical security, policy.. grr
ARRRGGHH.. must stop security babble! okok.. moving on..
Additional steps(keeping additional switches from being used in lilo):
- add password=<insert password here> to lilo
add restricted keyword if you only want to use the password to send additional options
for the truly parinoid I would recommend researching crypto file systems..
Finnaly,
Think physical security if possible,
Curious
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 12:19:39PM +0200 or thereabouts, Gina Lanik wrote:
> > hm, what I forgot - no I don't mean removing the entry for runlevel 1.
> > relevant part of my inittab:
> > # What to do in single-user mode.
> > ~~:S:wait:/sbin/sulogin
> > HTH & HAND,
>
> This won't cover booting with sash or /bin/bash as the command, though,
> will it?
>
> Telsa
>
> _______________________________________________
> techtalk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
--
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.curious.org/
/ \ - NO Word docs in e-mail "This quote is false." -anon
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk