You say 'back door', most of us say 'recovery feature'.
Ah well. Most of us consider backdoors to be those that
can
accessed *remotely* since that is what truly counts in
most of our lives. As we have continued to say ad
nauseum,
there is no such thing a *truly* secure machine if a
good
system admin or hacker is at the console, root workaround
or not.
And Cisco wouldn't put the same feature in it's IOS
if it weren't a FEATURE that was needed when you
have
console access. But quite frankly, I am getting sick of
this
argument, and just want it to stop. This ain't a security
hole, folks. I guess if you don't like the feature, then
fix
it. I just don't understand why this person doesn't take
all of this advice she has been given and just secure
her
darn machine and stop bothering us about why it isn't
as
secure as Windows (bwahaha). Take it up with the
distro
developers. Or even better, make you own distro where
it
isn't the default setting! That's the great thing
about
Linux...we, the people, have access to the code and
can
do such things.
Amy
|
- [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on the linuxchix t... Coinneach MacSandair
- Re: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on the li... jenn
- Re: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on th... Gina Lanik
- Re: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on th... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on the li... Amy
- Re: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on the li... Marisa Mack
- Re: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on th... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on th... Caitlyn Martin
- RE: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on the li... Angela Nash
- RE: [techtalk] About prettyphysicslady on the li... Angela Nash