BTW if any of you truly feel that QT isn't "free enough"...
the harmony project (last updated {unless there is another location I
don't know about} March 26,1999)
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.curious.org/
/ \ - NO Word docs in e-mail "This quote is false." -anon
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Fan, Laurel wrote:
> Patricia Jung, [EMAIL PROTECTED], said:
> > Harmony died the day one of its core developers decided to do the real
> > thing and join Trolltech to develop Qt. No one asked him to change his
> > mind, no one payed for that -- and even if he's a single person: Isn't
> > it that -- if anything -- convincing?
>
> So, someone is working for a company on a closed source product...
> and not getting paid? I don't know what that convinces me of.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> techtalk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
>
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
