On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 05:10:55PM -0700, Nicole Zimmerman wrote:
> > Also, OO is a rather advanced abstraction. I didn't get it the first
> > time I tried to pick it up (with a rather poor C++ book, not Dietel &
> > Dietel). Of course, I also didn't have an instructor to go with the
> > reading, but procedural is still easier to think in than OO.
>
> Hmm, I don't think so... I think it depends on who you are. C++ was the
> first language I learned (then I went back and did vanilla C), to me
> thinking OO and thinking procedural are just two different modes of
*Now* it is that way for me.
> writing code, being a lazy person I prefer the OO mode :o)
I'm a technomasochist.
> > trip, again, it has its uses. I got accepted into Pre-Engineering at
> > UW, I intend to go into Computer Engineering (most college's offer it as
> > EE/CS), so it is nice to learn more about how the actual hardware works
>
> Good luck actually getting in to any engineering major, they are all
> competitive (tm, officially). Friends of mine that did very well in high
I know, but I also already have an extremely strong grasp on
Calculus, math and computers. Beyond that, I'm also decently well
rounded. I think I'm in a really good position for what is going to be
thrown at me next year.
> One of the many reasons I did not choose the UW, even though it's close to
> home.
Yes, but they have one of the top engineering schools, and it is close
to home for me too.
--
Jeff
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/M/>P d-(pu) s+:- a17>? C++(++++) L+++ UL++++@>$ P+ E--- W++@ N+ o? K++ w--- O? M
V- PS+ PE(--)@ Y+@ PGP++ t+ 5 X++@ R++@ !tv@ b++ DI++++ D- G e- h! r% y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
My Public Key -- http://24.5.73.229/pubkey.txt
PGP signature
