Ian Phillips wrote: > > > IMO, debian has a better package manager. It also has about 3000 > > What's better about it? I know (roughly) how RPM works and what features it offers, >but what advantages does dpkg give me? Apart from better quality control ;-) > > Yours, > Ian. in that case,i think it's because the easy upgrade path of apt,you run the command apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade to get an updated system,but i think rpm is easier to work with in the development standpoint (craft a spec file then rpm -BB if memory is right to build a new package from source and some app have configure script which build the spec file beside the other needed files). Alain -- Three things are certain: Death, taxes, and lost data. Guess which has occured. ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- Re: [techtalk] X in Corel vs. Red Hat (was: winmo... Laurel Fan
- RE: [techtalk] X in Corel vs. Red Hat (was: w... Ian Phillips
- RE: [techtalk] X in Corel vs. Red Hat (wa... sara korhonen
- Re: [techtalk] X in Corel vs. Red Hat (wa... Laurel Fan
- [techtalk] Package managers, was: X ... Nils Philippsen
- RE: [techtalk] Package managers,... Ian Phillips
- [techtalk] glibc and libc5 ? K. Ziel
- Re: [techtalk] glibc and libc5 ? Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] glibc and libc5 ? K. Ziel
- [techtalk] bash v1 vs. v2, was: ... Nils Philippsen
- Re: [techtalk] X in Corel vs. Red Hat (wa... Alain Toussaint
- Re: [techtalk] X in Corel vs. Red Hat (was: winmo... Alain Toussaint
- Re: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver Theresa Radke
- [techtalk] Inexpensive Linux Machines Amanda Owens
- Re: [techtalk] Inexpensive Linux Machines Clint Forgy
- RE: [techtalk] winmodem sound driver J B