Elizabeth wrote:
> {snippage}
> b.when using (and when I installed) StarOffice it takes (took) a _very_
> long time to load the program (as in minutes), once i'm using it its okay.
> But I have 64 mb ram (and I think 128 swap), and from what I've read,
> people are doing it with much less and more successfully. Any idea why?
> I'm using afterstep for my WM. [Netscape does better, and only takes
> seconds to load up]
Ditto. I don't have the exact same set up but similar, and I have noticed the
same problem with StarOffice. Also, I agree that it seems like others on this
list can make lesser machines perform better than mine. I wonder where I'm
going wrong...
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Meredith
--
Sometimes big things
do come in small packages...
PintSize Graphics & Web Hosting Inc.
http://www.pintsize.com
************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
