Hi Robie, others, On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 5:12 PM Robie Basak <robie.ba...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > If so, that sounds like something for the Release Team to decide, having > consulted the teams they consider relevant. I imagine they'll want to > ensure that there aren't any implied expectations that won't be met, or > any technical failures due to implied assumptions about the meaning of > that field. > > Presumably we'd also make this change only in the development release, > rather than trying to change history in existing stable releases? > > In the past we had people like Steve who would immediately know the > implications and we'd all trust to make the right call, but now we > don't, so we have to be more careful :-/ > > Release Team: could you make a recommendation here please, for the > Technical Board to consider?
Yes - please consider marking RISC-V as an official architecture. As far the release process goes, we already treat them as official images. And as Colin said earlier in the thread, please consider doing this for Questing onward and it'd be better to not touch the other stable releases. Please let me know if you'd like anything else from our side. Thanks. - u -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
