On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 1:42 PM Robie Basak <robie.ba...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> [adding ubuntu-release@] > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 04:53:32PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > On pages like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/plucky the riscv64 > architecture > > is marked as "unofficial". > > Looks like this corresponds to the "official" attribute of the > underlying distro_arch_series API object in Launchpad, which presumably > the TB can adjust as required. > > I think you're implying a request to changing the value of this > attribute to True? > Yes, riscv64 should not have a lesser status than armhf or arm64. Best regards Heinrich > > If so, that sounds like something for the Release Team to decide, having > consulted the teams they consider relevant. I imagine they'll want to > ensure that there aren't any implied expectations that won't be met, or > any technical failures due to implied assumptions about the meaning of > that field. > > Presumably we'd also make this change only in the development release, > rather than trying to change history in existing stable releases? > > In the past we had people like Steve who would immediately know the > implications and we'd all trust to make the right call, but now we > don't, so we have to be more careful :-/ > > Release Team: could you make a recommendation here please, for the > Technical Board to consider? > > Thanks, > > Robie >
-- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
