On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 11:05:36PM -0500, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote: > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:23 PM Steve Langasek <steve.langa...@ubuntu.com> > wrote:
> > - fellow TB members: let's please discuss how we can sustainably audit > > that flavors are continuing to meet the requirements for recognition. > Specifically for *that* requirement, being that at least one active > developer with the sufficient upload rights exists, we have scripts > for the DMB that could be adapted to warn when some teams have no > members. I don't think it would be much work to adapt it to check > memberships for packagesets. > The packageset reports [1] already include all the information, too. > [1] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/packagesets/disco/ To fully audit this requires answering a different question: is there at least one member of the development team for the flavor who is active and has upload rights to all the packages in the packageset? This might mean the members of the flavor team with upload rights are MOTU or core-dev rather than having PPU on the packageset. And we can't rely on membership in the flavor development team being an indicator of current activity. Is this something you'd want to modify the DMB scripts to try to tackle, at least the parts that can be automated? (Probably not the bit where we have to confirm that uploaders are currently active and interested in continuing to be responsible for the flavor) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
