Hi All,
Thanks for all of your insightful suggestions. I think I'm totally agree with Kees's items and the others' supplement. Do you have any more comments? I'm going to have a conclusion today night (I mean Apr 6) and it might need a vote from TB. -- Regards, Jack Yu UbuntuKylin Team At 2014-04-06 09:13:11,"Kees Cook" <k...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 06:14:08PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:43:03PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> > >> > FWIW, I'm fine with this configuration: >> > - signed by Canonical (no 2nd root of trust) >> > - on by default only in Ubuntu Kylin >> > - hosted on non-Canonical servers >> >> Sorry to be late to this party, though I think Steve and Stephane both >> represented my views quite well. I'm good with the simple summary by >> kees above with the (obvious, I think) s/hosted/distributed/ change to >> the last line. >> >> Obviously, this infrastructure is hosted by Canonical, but should not >> be distributed by them, except for the single rsync-over-ssh point of >> sync to the user-facing distribution server(s) operated by the Kylin >> folks. > >Right, sorry. I meant built on Canonical infrastructure, distributed >from non-Canonical infrastructure. > >-Kees > >-- >Kees Cook
-- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
