Marcus Glocker wrote: > Me too. Would it be ok to merge utvfu.c and utvfu_ops.c by including > both Copyrights in this file? Should it be > > [Copyright 1] > [Code 1] > [Copyright 2] > [Code 2] > > or > > [Copyright 1] > [Copyright 2] > [Code 1] > [Code 2] >
Historically, the second has been popular, but that's also when the new code is mixed in with old. If it's entirely new code, I think the top option is better because it allows separation later. We have some files where all the [code 1] gets deleted, but the copyright remains, somewhat dubious.
