Yes. I suppose it comes down to can we crank the minor for a portable release if it had not been
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, Theo de Raadt <[email protected]> wrote: > But it also means if a new LibreSSL release is going to go out, and there > hasn't been an ABI crank.... > > > That's actually the point. Because while released releases might, if > anyone > > is testing snapshot portable builds from github they might not. And still > > don't get fucked. > > > > On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, Theo de Raadt <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering out loud if these versions should follow the openbsd > shlib > > > > major minor numbers. That is where we are careful about semantic > > > > versioning for api change/add/remove > > > > > > One note. > > > > > > If that is decided, on occasion libressl-portable could skip a release > > > number. Probably fine for everyone. > >
