I mean we know we do this right in openbsd. It doesn't make sense to me to hope the bundlers out there do in a vacuum. Sure they will still fuck up. But at least this way the horse is properly lead to water
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, Bob Beck <[email protected]> wrote: > That's actually the point. Because while released releases might, if > anyone is testing snapshot portable builds from github they might not. And > still don't get fucked. > > On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, Theo de Raadt <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> > I'm wondering out loud if these versions should follow the openbsd shlib >> > major minor numbers. That is where we are careful about semantic >> > versioning for api change/add/remove >> >> One note. >> >> If that is decided, on occasion libressl-portable could skip a release >> number. Probably fine for everyone. >> >
