thib@,

That's a much better suggestion, also keeping in mind what jmc@ said.
I will send a unified diff against the following file over the
weekend.

http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/www/faq/faq14.html

But first I will tear down the mirror and document everything from scratch.

Thanks for your feedback

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Thordur Bjornsson <t...@openbsd.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:35:54PM -0500, Nick Guenther wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 04:24:07PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I just configured a mirror using softraid, the manpage was extremely
>> >> helpful. I just copy pasted the relevant commands. To a complete
>> >> newbie, it was missing a few more lines. I just added those and
>> >> sending the diff. I hope a variation of this is accepted to make the
>> >> "how to create mirror using softraid" is complete. Googling brings a
>> >> lot of RAIDFrame etc, there is very little out there on a pure data
>> >> mirror.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> amit
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Index: softraid.4
>> >> ===================================================================
>> >> RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/softraid.4,v
>> >> retrieving revision 1.27
>> >> diff softraid.4
>> >> 147a148,159
>> >> > .Pp
>> >> > To use the freshly created mirror
>> >> > .Bd -literal -offset indent
>> >> > # mkdir /datamirror
>> >> > # mount /dev/sd0a /datamirror
>> >> > # chown normal_openbsd_user /datamirror
>> >> > .Ed
>> >> > .Pp
>> >> > Adding the following line to /etc/fstab will make it useful after
every
>> boot
>> >> > .Bd -literal -offset indent
>> >> > /dev/sd0a /datamirror ffs rw,softdep,nodev,nosuid 1 2
>> >> > .Pp
>> >
>> > (as an aside, please send unified diffs (-u) in future)
>> >
>> > there is a line near the end of EXAMPLES:
>> >
>> >        The RAID volume is now ready to be used as a normal disk device.
>> >
>> > for me, the instructions you've added come under the umbrella of
>> > using the raid partition as a normal disk partition. so i'd argue
>> > that it's outside the remit of this page.
>> >
>> > maybe other developers think otherwise though.
>>
>> As someone who has long been a newbie, this sort of trivial pointer
>> can be a life-saver. If you think like a programmer and see your OS as
>> a program this sort of thing comes naturally, but lots of people
>> don't.
>
> IMO, this kind of details are most suitable for a FAQ entry.
> Maybe section 14.13 of the FAQ could use some love ?

Reply via email to