On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:08:17PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > Eventually there are usage scenarios where setting the maximum > > performance to 50% (or whatever value) may make sense -- if you want to > > save some power, for example. Anyway, I was just trying to make sure > > everyone understands that this patch will, somehow, remove a feature > > currently available although I understand my case is absolutely > > irrelevant. > > I don't believe it.
And I don't care.
