> On 2010/03/08 22:05, Lars Nooden wrote: >> That the option '-' is depreciated in favor of '-l' could be >> emphasized more.
On 2010-3-8 11:44 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > it's 'deprecate', not 'depreciate', they have different meanings. Ok. I withdraw the suggestion due to the typo and other complications. On 2010-3-9 12:17 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote: > it could be emphasised more. but we have a lot of pages using a fairly > standard format (describe what option does, but note it is > deprecated). we could talk about moving all pages to that format, > but that's really another discussion. When, after the release of 4.7, would be the appropriate time and venue to bring that discussion up? /Lars
