On Sun, 11 Jan 2015, John Sellens wrote:
On Sun, 2015/01/11 10:50:53PM -0500, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: | Definitely overkill. I used to do that; my excuse is that it was my testbed | for a departmental upgrade. For small setups, dovecot makes more sense. | Alpine is still the tool for migration from Pine to IMAP, though (and | possibly continuing...).I believe that the Pine mail client had IMAP support if not right from the start, very early on. In this discussion, I'm not clear on how Matt is currently accessing his mail (direct from mbox, IMAP, POP), or how the mail is stored on the server (mbox, maildir, etc). But, if Matt's messages are to be believed, it looks like he is already using Alpine to read mail (from the first message): User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14) I fear we might be giving Matt advice on how to get to an end point, without knowing what the starting point is, and thus muddying the waters more than necessary. (My guess is he's already using IMAP, but I'm not sure I've seen the current IMAP server mentioned. And the idea of Postfix having a limit on the mailbox size seems unexpected to me.)
I'm guessing that he has Postfix delivering the mail to local mbox files, and something is compiled for 32 bits (resulting in the 2G file size limit)
David Lang
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
